May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is an excellent alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
As well as the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning Disposable Vape labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.